When California passed its 2021 congressional map, the legislators in Sacramento weren't given political performance data. They were given spreadsheets that listed only one variable for each new district: race. Black. Hispanic. Asian. And then — wait for it — "Other." Everybody who wasn't part of the Democrat racial coalition was labeled Other.
Constitutional litigator J. Christian Adams, President of the Public Interest Legal Foundation, walks Jenny Beth Martin through the smoking-gun evidence already entered in the Noyes v. California redistricting case — and explains why, after the Supreme Court's Louisiana v. Callais ruling, California's racially-saturated map is in serious legal jeopardy.
Christian also explains the crucial constitutional line: partisan gerrymandering is legal under Rucho v. Common Cause, but racial gerrymandering is not. Had California simply drawn the map for partisan advantage, the maps would likely stand. Instead, they openly designed districts to elect specific racial outcomes — and they wrote it down.
If you care about equal protection, the rule of law, and color-blind constitutional government, this is one of the most important segments of the year.
Call your senators at 202-224-3121.
Subscribe at jennybethshow.com and teapartypatriots.org.
00:00 — The Maxine Waters example
00:30 — California's race-only redistricting spreadsheet
01:20 — The "Other" category and the racial coalition exposed
01:55 — Why nobody in California expects accountability
02:30 — Partisan gerrymandering vs. racial gerrymandering
03:10 — Rucho v. Common Cause and what California could have done
03:35 — Why Tarrant County's partisan map survived
#JennyBethShow #SupremeCourt #VotingRights #Redistricting #California #JChristianAdams #15thAmendment #ConstitutionalLaw #ElectionIntegrity