Fighting for Conservative Principles in Colorado | Ron Hanks, Candidate for Congress CO 3rd District
The Jenny Beth ShowJune 07, 2024x
70
00:41:0438.52 MB

Fighting for Conservative Principles in Colorado | Ron Hanks, Candidate for Congress CO 3rd District

In this episode of "The Jenny Beth Show," Jenny Beth Martin is joined by Ron Hanks, a candidate for Colorado's third congressional district. Hanks shares his motivation for running, rooted in his extensive military background and commitment to conservative values. He discusses key issues such as border security, American energy independence, and the importance of restoring election integrity. Hanks also addresses the challenges facing Colorado, including federal land grabs and water rights. Throughout the conversation, he emphasizes the need for a conservative Congress to support a pro-America agenda and ensure the nation's security and prosperity.

Twitter/X: @RonHanksCD3 | @jennybethm

Website: hanksforcolorado.comg

[00:00:00] is

[00:00:25] Jenny Beth Martin is the co-founder of Tea Party Patriots. She is an author, a

[00:00:30] filmmaker, and one of Time magazine's most influential people in the world. But

[00:00:35] the title she is most proud of is Mom to Her Boy Girl Twins. She has been at

[00:00:40] the forefront fighting to protect America's core principles for more than

[00:00:44] a decade. Welcome to The Jenny Beth Show. Today Ron Hanks is joining us. He

[00:00:50] is running for Colorado's third congressional district seat, and I am

[00:00:56] looking forward to the conversation with him to learn about why he's running for

[00:00:59] Congress and what he intends to do if he is elected. Ron, thanks so much for

[00:01:03] joining me today. Well good morning Jenny Beth. Thank you for the invite. I

[00:01:07] appreciate it very much. Why are you running for Congress? It is such a

[00:01:13] swamp in Washington DC. I think that people who step up and run are to be

[00:01:19] admired and also to be questioned a little bit about their sanity. Examined

[00:01:23] heavily, yes. I believe you're right. The reason I'm running as you probably

[00:01:28] know, Lauren Boebert shifted from CD3 to CD4 and so as soon as that

[00:01:36] happened I started getting phone calls and they said Hanks we need to keep

[00:01:40] this conservative seat. None of the other people in the race are

[00:01:45] conservative. None of them have a record. I was in the state house here so people

[00:01:50] know I do have a conservative record and they finally they asked would you

[00:01:55] do this? And it's hard to say no as you know Jenny Beth to anybody who's

[00:01:59] in the fight and I thought of Donald Trump he doesn't have to be in

[00:02:04] this fight and yet he continues and I feel he needs a conservative

[00:02:09] Congress that doesn't sandbag him like Paul Ryan or Kevin McCarthy would

[00:02:13] have. So really the mission to me is to hold this seat conservative, find more

[00:02:21] conservatives like the Freedom Caucus types, let's get a speaker that puts

[00:02:26] the Make America Great agenda on the calendar in the legislature. So what are

[00:02:33] your top issues and well first what are your core values? What are the

[00:02:38] values that that you think are important that motivate you to run and

[00:02:43] then let's talk about issues underneath those values. Yeah I appreciate that. You

[00:02:47] know I joined the military right out of high school in 1984 and Ronald Reagan

[00:02:53] was my first commander-in-chief and I retired in November of 2017 so Donald

[00:03:00] Trump was my last commander-in-chief and my values were all built and

[00:03:04] established really before I joined the service through talking around the

[00:03:09] dinner table with parents and grandparents but you know it's always

[00:03:14] been a service to the nation. It was a blessing to serve in the Air Force for

[00:03:20] 32 years and everything that we accomplished. That's the reason I'm

[00:03:26] doing this run, that's the reason I ran for state house and served two

[00:03:31] years was it's an extension of military service and you know Joe

[00:03:36] Biden's put us in a ditch with this open border and as a military intel guy I

[00:03:42] am very concerned that we have terrorist events in our future based off

[00:03:49] of the people that have slipped across the border so border is absolutely the

[00:03:54] first and foremost concern of mine and the district and frankly all

[00:03:59] Americans. Next I would say energy, we have to get American energy

[00:04:04] dominance back and very briefly Jenny Beth when I wasn't working for the Air

[00:04:09] Force I did some fracking up in North Dakota so I have a good sense of the

[00:04:14] energy industry from that perspective and I know blue-collar America can

[00:04:19] bring us back. When Donald Trump gets the White House we can restart that

[00:04:24] Keystone pipeline and start building back our petroleum reserves that as

[00:04:30] you know Joe Biden has drained for political gain and so energy and then

[00:04:36] bring an American manufacturing back things that never should have left

[00:04:40] this continent in the first place should be back here in America.

[00:04:46] Lastly it's agriculture and food supply I see that as a national

[00:04:50] security issue and the water ends up being a big deal out here in Colorado.

[00:04:58] That is something that I don't hear very often from candidates that

[00:05:03] agriculture and food supply are such important issues. Why is that an

[00:05:07] important issue for you? Well I mean look at what we saw since

[00:05:12] COVID with eggs going up to nine bucks a dozen and then all of the

[00:05:18] chicken processing plants burning up and we're sending live hogs to

[00:05:24] China for processing to bring back and that is just a choke point for

[00:05:31] starvation and for at least supply line shortages so I think we've done

[00:05:36] some rather short-sighted things to our food supply and we have to be

[00:05:43] thinking about that given the what's the old adage you're three meals

[00:05:49] away from a revolution it might be six meals but we can nitpick the number

[00:05:55] but we have to keep that constant and even with COVID which was I think

[00:06:00] a plandemic it was impressive and concerning how much our supply

[00:06:08] chain could be influenced by the masks and by the transportation

[00:06:14] blockages and so forth. You mentioned that you did fracking in North Dakota

[00:06:20] was that after you finished the military and before you were a state

[00:06:23] rep or sometime in between before? It was in the about 2013-2014

[00:06:30] time frame I was in the Air Force for 32 years I started off as an

[00:06:36] Arabic linguist and that was all active duty at some point I went and

[00:06:41] went into the reserve and then I commissioned when 9-11 hit given my

[00:06:48] Arabic language background I was fairly sought after and busy but I would

[00:06:55] deploy take orders for nine months to a year and then come back there was

[00:07:01] a period of time where I had an open space and I wanted to experience this

[00:07:08] gold rush of our generation you know it's kind of like the Klondike and the

[00:07:14] Alaska gold rush well it turns out I was probably a generation or two behind

[00:07:19] on my effort and the Air Force called and said Hanks we have a job

[00:07:24] for you in Kazakhstan doing counter drug would you like to do it and I

[00:07:28] said that's about minus 40 at the time working out there hammering iron

[00:07:34] I said yes I believe I would so but the point is I kind of come in and out of

[00:07:39] the Air Force as they had work available. Now why were you an Arabic

[00:07:47] linguist in 1984 before 9-11 happened that seems like you had a lot of

[00:07:56] foresight or maybe some family or how did you become that specialized?

[00:08:01] Well you know I enlisted and I took the aptitude tests and they said I had a

[00:08:08] linguistic ability and after that I was hoping for Russian because obviously

[00:08:13] that was the contest of the of the era but needs of the Air Force we all

[00:08:23] learned that phrase I think probably on our second day in basic training

[00:08:27] needs of the Air Force come first they needed Arabic and I was disappointed

[00:08:32] initially but I mean it has really been a blessing in so many ways that my

[00:08:39] understanding of the Middle East is pretty solid given you know the

[00:08:43] time frame of working from Morocco to Iraq and the the Saudi Peninsula as

[00:08:50] well so I mean I've got a good breadth of knowledge of that and of

[00:08:54] course the things going on in Israel with Hamas and Hezbollah and such.

[00:09:00] And elaborate on that what do you think about the situation in Israel from the

[00:09:05] terrorist group Hamas? Well you know Iran is behind most of this all of

[00:09:12] this and I think the world has been incredibly patient Jenny Beth on the

[00:09:17] whole thing of this Islamic Republic of Iran and frankly the 7th of October I

[00:09:25] think should have worn everybody's patience out and I think I think regime

[00:09:30] change is in order in Iran. We've put up with this for four decades now.

[00:09:37] What are we coming up on? Nearly 50 years of this and you know if they

[00:09:43] weren't there and I'm firmly believe the majority of the Iranian people do

[00:09:48] not want to live under this Islamic Revolution and Republic. If they

[00:09:55] weren't there anymore I think we could have a much more peaceful world when

[00:09:59] Donald Trump gets back into office I think those Abraham Accords could

[00:10:04] could really start rolling again and regain the momentum and that's

[00:10:09] certainly what Iran does not want to see happen under this Islamic Republic

[00:10:14] and I think there need to be discussions if not out in the open

[00:10:19] among western governments about how much longer Iran should stand and be

[00:10:26] able to support this kind of just disgusting terrorism. I mean this is

[00:10:32] this was gruesome. Now talking about the world stage

[00:10:41] we talked about Iran what do you think about the threats from China?

[00:10:47] I'm very concerned. Beyond our food supply. Yeah. Beyond our food supply. Well they've got us

[00:10:52] you know six ways to sunday there with their ability to block trade the way that they can

[00:10:59] infiltrate our equipment and I would go straight to our election machines.

[00:11:06] The laptops are made in China communist China by Chinese workers. I mean that's a problem

[00:11:14] and it's a long discussion. Also our transformers a good number of our high

[00:11:20] percentage of our electrical transformers come from China and we had one that came into

[00:11:26] Colorado that took five years to get it. That's about the waiting list now and it had a little

[00:11:31] blister box on it that they didn't recognize and it's been told to me that they had it

[00:11:38] inspected and it was an add-on a kill switch. I don't know the specifics of whether it was

[00:11:48] cyber where they could kick in and monitor this or what but the bottom line is you know

[00:11:54] we are setting ourselves up to be ruined with our simply through our trade with China

[00:12:01] and then look at all of the Chinese military age males coming across the border.

[00:12:07] The fentanyl coming across it's killing people if we start having 9 11 events my biggest concern

[00:12:14] is we're going to have food poisonings of fentanyl sort of like the we saw up in well

[00:12:22] a better example probably is Chicago the Tylenol scare back in the 80s with the cyanide in the

[00:12:29] Tylenol and then there's been efforts for salmonella and so forth by the Raj Nish

[00:12:36] sect up in Oregon. Those are the types of things I look at and I think we're being

[00:12:42] set up that that could happen at a time of the enemy's choosing and this is all on Joe

[00:12:48] Biden's desk. He's a traitor to me and the article three section three aid and comfort

[00:12:55] to the enemy and he's provided it. He's let them in he's given people that have crossed

[00:13:01] he's given them safe passage money transportation and that's aid and abetting the enemy.

[00:13:09] And then you mentioned the military age people from China coming into the country and you

[00:13:15] talked about the border briefly elaborate on what you think are the problems regarding the

[00:13:21] border and what do you envision the solutions being? Yeah the problems I've been monitoring

[00:13:26] this since I retired from the military at the end of 2017. I've made three separate trips all

[00:13:33] at my own expense driving the roads and talking with the guards it's a big difference

[00:13:38] between now and six years ago when I first started doing this but initially in 2018 they

[00:13:46] were building the wall and the agents were very talkative you could roll the window down

[00:13:51] put your elbow out and talk between the vehicles as you're driving the easement road.

[00:13:56] When I went back in 2021 I was down in Arizona to do the Maricopa audit and to look

[00:14:02] at it and then we brought help on our second trip. I went to the border totally different the

[00:14:09] agents didn't want to talk to you they'd tell you go take all of your questions back to the

[00:14:13] field office to the press representative. This can be fixed Jenny Beth with the stroke of a pen

[00:14:21] and that's why it's imperative to get Donald Trump in the White House he can change policy

[00:14:26] and say we're closing them where they'll remain in Mexico is back and forth agents are now

[00:14:32] empowered and directed to stop immigrants and retain them and then from a legislator's

[00:14:41] perspective what needs to be done after that is look we had all that material on site

[00:14:47] ready to put up and it's gone now so thanks Joe Biden now we get to go replace that but

[00:14:55] let's pay for it let's build it and let's go if somehow we can put 60 billion 200 billion

[00:15:02] towards Ukraine we can surely finish the remaining mileage on our southern border.

[00:15:08] We also need to look at our northern borders and our coasts we got to beef those up as well.

[00:15:14] Absolutely so you mentioned those issues of border energy independence we talked about the

[00:15:22] world stage what are other issues that are important to you and that you are hearing

[00:15:30] when you're talking to voters as you're working to persuade voters? Yeah it is certainly if I

[00:15:37] had four pillars of concern and they're all national security it is border it is energy

[00:15:43] it is manufacturing and it is ag and food supply but as far as good governance

[00:15:51] people want this government under control and you know we haven't had a budget process that's

[00:15:58] worked since 2007 and I think that may be a little bit of a nebulous budgeting process too.

[00:16:06] Look I think we ought to audit the federal reserve right off the top I am fully on board

[00:16:12] with that and then I think we need to have budgets for every executive branch department

[00:16:20] separately not an omnibus spending bill that just throws things in we ought to go from A to Z

[00:16:27] Department of Agriculture, Department of Interior, Department of Veterans Affairs all the way to the

[00:16:31] end of the list and while we're at it we could get rid of a couple of those executive

[00:16:37] branches or blend a couple together let's get rid of Department of Education. One important

[00:16:42] distinction Jenny Beth is I hear people say the money should go back to the states

[00:16:47] I would say no it needs to go back to the people it needs to either be retained by or

[00:16:53] returned to the people because I've been in the state legislature and they'd love to have

[00:16:59] the billions just do a u-turn and come back to their their coffers we we got to make sure

[00:17:06] it stays in the parents hands and pockets because this government's too expensive we

[00:17:12] can't afford it we don't even know what it's spending our money to do.

[00:17:18] You're right about that we're spending so much money and it is absolutely out of control

[00:17:25] and when COVID happened and the numbers increased I think that we're we've come down

[00:17:33] a little but we're definitely not below COVID we're not at the numbers that we were at in 2019

[00:17:39] and we're never gonna I don't want to say we're never going to be there again but it's

[00:17:43] going to take a lot of hard work to rein this government back in and to quit spending

[00:17:49] so much money it's just I think it is obscene how much money our government spends.

[00:17:56] It is and I think we got one shot at it I and I see this as the two phases of victory we have

[00:18:05] to get Donald Trump back in office and then that's good but he has to have a congress

[00:18:12] that doesn't try to run out the clock on him and this is going to be an important four years

[00:18:18] for Trump because it's also his last four we're going to have a process of trying to figure

[00:18:24] out who succeeds him in the Republican leadership role in by 2028 so we have to get Trump in we

[00:18:34] have to get a conservative congress it's not conservative enough we have people that quit on

[00:18:39] us like Ken Buck and Mike Gallagher and of course Kevin McCarthy in December of 23 these

[00:18:46] are not the people we're looking for this old tired establishment carriage is worn out and

[00:18:55] we need a Gideon's army of about 300 conservative Republicans very interesting point here in

[00:19:01] Colorado we don't all of the Republicans have left their district so Doug Lamborn retired

[00:19:11] Ken Buck quit Lauren Boebert shifted so she's an incumbent but kind of you know work in a new

[00:19:18] territory but she's conservative we have a shot at three very solid conservative

[00:19:24] districts in Colorado wouldn't it be nice if we put all pro-Trump people in there there's

[00:19:29] a possibility of a fourth as well but I would like to change the complexion of the

[00:19:35] perception of Colorado as having gone so far to the left we could certainly do that if we have

[00:19:41] three or four pro-Trump Republicans representing the state of Colorado.

[00:19:49] Okay and I want to elaborate on Colorado I do want to say one thing Ken Buck and Mike Gallagher

[00:19:54] quitting I think are much different than um Kevin McCarthy once he was no longer speaker

[00:20:01] I think that at that point it I just I don't want to I don't think you should pour salt

[00:20:09] in somebody's wound and he was wounded at that that point figuratively speaking but also more

[00:20:15] importantly we you can't have two heads of a single house and so stepping aside so that

[00:20:21] Mike Johnson could be the speaker without McCarthy being in there day to day which is

[00:20:27] similar to what happened when Boehner wound up resigning I think that that is the right

[00:20:35] the right way to handle things I would imagine that if he was still in the conference it

[00:20:40] it would create an even more dysfunctional Republican conference than what we have right

[00:20:45] now. You may be very well right on that but the concern I have is just the numbers and

[00:20:52] gap you know yeah and that is absolutely I understand what you're talking about with

[00:20:58] that completely understand with that and in his district was was a safe district so

[00:21:03] I just sort of I don't when I think about when I keep tapping that I apologize

[00:21:08] tapping the microphone there but um when I think about um the ones who quit I think it's

[00:21:16] much different when you're looking at what Ken Buck or Mike Gallagher did not finishing

[00:21:20] out their term than then McCarthy who was forcibly removed as speaker figuratively speaking

[00:21:28] forcibly. Okay now um going back to Colorado you've got the opportunity to have more

[00:21:35] conservative members of Congress what Colorado sure seems deep deep blue so what do you what

[00:21:44] do you what kind of encouragement can you give to people who are not just not from

[00:21:49] Colorado but from other states about how you can have conservative representation and

[00:21:56] and it's not maybe it's not as deep blue as we think or maybe it is but there's still some

[00:22:00] bright red hopes. Well you know Denver rules the roost just due to size and mass there um

[00:22:08] but the outline in your district is massive right I mean you're one congressional district

[00:22:15] and describe your district for the people listening. Yeah it is big it's uh 27 counties

[00:22:23] and it touches the northwest corner whereas square state and it touches the northwest

[00:22:28] corner the southwest corner and it is 50 miles from touching the southeast corner so I've

[00:22:36] in the course of my travels I just about see all three of them uh 27 counties much of it

[00:22:44] is west of the continental divide the western slope so called and but there's a lot there's all

[00:22:51] of southern Colorado there as well so water ends up being a big deal because we've got water

[00:22:56] flowing east west and south and uh you know we've got all kinds of issues and we're the

[00:23:02] point of origin of water uh for all the downstream so that's another big issue that's

[00:23:08] going to be on the radar. One of the most important things for people of Colorado is that

[00:23:15] you know we own the water as it's here and we need to not give up our rights to a federal

[00:23:20] government that is working to land grab uh with this 30 by 30 agenda and all these

[00:23:27] monuments that are coming up uh where the Dolores monument on the western side

[00:23:34] they are trying to lock up grazing land but also uranium and vanadium mining areas that's our

[00:23:41] the majority of our uh uranium and vanadium comes from that area it's all land grabs

[00:23:47] and so that's what we're trying to fight in a district this big they're trying to grab it from

[00:23:52] all over. Um I want you to go back to Colorado in just a second but hold on yes ma'am it's

[00:24:01] you're talking about things that make a lot of sense to the people who live out west

[00:24:05] but the people who live in the east coast don't quite understand these things when you talk about

[00:24:10] a monument you're not talking about a statue in the middle of a park you're actually talking

[00:24:14] about basically um it's almost a national park right it's not designated as a park but it's

[00:24:22] it is treated very similarly to what a national park is treated it when you're talking about

[00:24:28] the monument like that right? Yes and I appreciate you making that distinction and uh

[00:24:34] clarity for folks uh yeah national monument uh in this case they don't know how much they want

[00:24:40] they just know they want to grab it and the they I'm referring to is the federal government

[00:24:47] and frankly the globalist uh whole purpose of this um the you know the the world agenda

[00:24:56] uh Dolores monument is somewhere in the neighborhood of 600,000 to 1.4 million acres

[00:25:05] we've got grassland out of the district I was just looking at old maps where they're trying

[00:25:09] to add another 600,000 acres of grassland down in the San Luis Valley which touches

[00:25:16] uh the Rio Grande goes through and it touches New Mexico they're looking at some kind of a

[00:25:23] land grab but they don't even know what they want it whether it's a conservation area whether it's

[00:25:28] a national wildlife you know they've got all these different terminologies for it

[00:25:33] and what they do is they come in with this grandiose non-governmental organization that has

[00:25:39] shiny signs and sign up sheets and you know how great they're going to be for the community

[00:25:46] and oh your place looks torn down and worn out but if we make this a monument uh it will thrive

[00:25:54] and uh people aren't buying it but I can tell you from the outside looking in it with all

[00:26:01] the shiny pamphlets it looks compelling but the fact is it makes grazing harder it makes

[00:26:09] hunting harder it makes recreation harder and uh you know nobody can make a gate like the US

[00:26:16] government they can decide that they want to close a road and they'll have a cast iron

[00:26:24] gate that you can't cut the lock shoot the lock even if it's your mining claim for instance

[00:26:29] you can't get to it because they're they build them right that's our federal government

[00:26:34] now it isn't um land of many uses and for the people it's lock it up and watch it burn or

[00:26:43] keep it under our controls so nobody else can use it except those we deem worthy and frankly

[00:26:50] the problem we have is the people they deem worthy ain't us you know it's a bigger global

[00:26:56] scheme so okay now going back because I completely interrupted you were talking about

[00:27:03] Colorado and you said that Denver controls most of Colorado so keep going I'm just trying to

[00:27:09] refresh your memory there yes ma'am just by population and politics uh you know it's it's

[00:27:15] left it's gotten more left I think as the tech boom came in that seems to be kind of the

[00:27:20] precursor for big change um but but the other districts uh outside of that the rural areas are

[00:27:29] still very rural we have several counties in this state that have under a thousand people

[00:27:35] living in them they are considered frontier uh counties and uh you know those remain conservative

[00:27:43] because there's the traditional way of life of farming and ranching and of course the

[00:27:50] the hunting in Colorado is first class um you know that there's as we this country progresses

[00:27:58] there's fewer and fewer hunters but uh you know as a land management process the hunting is has

[00:28:04] been a very effective way to maintain the balance of in nature so um yeah it's very conservative

[00:28:13] and so I think people should take a little bit of heart and I think this is going to be a

[00:28:19] watershed election uh Jenny Beth I I firmly believe as a military intel guy that's done a

[00:28:26] lot of analysis and briefing uh this one feels like our last election in the sense that

[00:28:33] this government doesn't feel like it's serving the people I don't even think it's by the people

[00:28:39] I think this is really a a face card for a puppet uh and the this regime is a purely

[00:28:49] a the face of a much larger globalist effort and whether you believe that or not we can at least

[00:28:57] agree that uh it's not serving the interests of the people and it needs to be replaced

[00:29:03] if we don't replace it in this election I think they have the ability to uh suspend all of them

[00:29:09] in the future you know I guess a final point I'd make is it's funny how many foreign nationals

[00:29:16] I've met you know that used to live under communism have come to this country become

[00:29:21] American citizens and say what's happening to this country I saw this in Poland when I left

[00:29:28] communist Poland or you know any place else and they know better probably than the average

[00:29:37] uh American-born citizen the steps and the processes I think we're seeing them right now

[00:29:42] yeah I think that we this election is pivotal I don't I don't think that we won't have elections

[00:29:52] again I I think we still will have elections again but I think that the next four and a half

[00:29:58] years in our country we've got massive just real issues that if we don't get a handle of

[00:30:05] them and we don't get the right solutions in place now we're going to be suffering the

[00:30:09] consequences of them for years and years and years to come in ways we can't even imagine

[00:30:16] and I think that what you're talking about with people who've been who are here in America and

[00:30:21] they escaped from communism or socialism they understand where we're headed communist countries

[00:30:28] socialist countries they don't thrive the same way that America has thrived in the past and we

[00:30:34] have to make sure that we are thriving and that each American family has the opportunity to do so

[00:30:40] as well yeah I totally agree with you and I think the we may have elections you may be right

[00:30:50] about that but they're going to look like Venezuela's or some uh you know Arab chic them

[00:30:57] where it's uh hey we win 98 to two again you know it's uh those are and I think we've we've

[00:31:04] got to get our elections fixed because both sides of the aisle uh Republican Democrat have concerns

[00:31:10] about it and that's the one way to walk ourselves back from a civil war is for all of us to have

[00:31:17] confidence in our election results yeah that's exactly right and I think that um we're we're

[00:31:24] recording this in the last week in May I think that um I read over the weekend that

[00:31:28] Hillary Clinton was out again saying that if Trump was elected we would have no chance

[00:31:32] of having more elections in this country so you have both sides of the aisle saying something that

[00:31:38] is devastating if it were to happen but the fact of the matter is whether Democrats want to

[00:31:46] admit it or not before 2020 if they you know they want to pretend like this didn't happen

[00:31:51] whatever but before 2020 they had problems and they had doubts in the outcome of elections

[00:31:57] Republicans now have problems and doubts in the outcome of elections and we have to restore that

[00:32:03] faith in the outcome of the election regardless of who wins I mean I care about who wins but

[00:32:08] we have to restore that faith in order to maintain stability and to maintain the peaceful

[00:32:14] transfer of power in our country and for it to be a country um with the consent of the

[00:32:20] governed we we have to to restore that faith because if we don't have it we're not

[00:32:26] we can't trust that the people who are governing us actually have our consent and it's a real

[00:32:31] problem that must be addressed yeah I completely agree and when I was elected in 2020 I believe

[00:32:38] Donald Trump was also elected but that uh turned out differently um it became my focus I did not

[00:32:46] know I would be focusing on election integrity but we are in a problem right now with what we

[00:32:52] have and it is it has to have both a state solution and a federal solution but bottom line

[00:32:59] I think we need to zero out our voter rolls and start over they're over inflated judicial

[00:33:04] watch has proven that they had a settlement even here in Colorado to because we have

[00:33:09] more eligible voters than actual residents in some some counties um but we need to get rid of

[00:33:17] the the old voter rolls start over use photo ids and now after this border incursion

[00:33:25] Jenny Beth I believe we're going to need to show proof of citizenship and uh I think that's

[00:33:30] going to be huge and and let's get rid of mail-in ballots we went from 30 mail-in pre-covid

[00:33:38] to over 70 post-covid there's a no chain of custody in that process and uh you know there's

[00:33:46] just a dozen issues with our elections that ought to be what the common American would agree

[00:33:52] to even if the parties want to sit here and throw knives at each other this is where the

[00:33:57] American people can really transcend political parties in my opinion that is absolutely correct

[00:34:05] and we you are right we need proof of citizenship I would say you need the proof

[00:34:09] of citizenship to register to vote um and then and then just proof of proof of voter id to vote

[00:34:18] and I I see that because most people aren't going to be going to vote with their with

[00:34:23] their passport or their driver I mean not their driver's license but their birth certificate

[00:34:27] so but they carry around their driver's license all the time so proof of citizenship

[00:34:32] to register to vote and then once you're registered voter voter id and I um was at

[00:34:38] the press conference several weeks ago with speaker Mike Johnson and congressman Chip Roy

[00:34:43] and Senator Mike Lee rolling out the SAVE Act which is Safeguarding America's uh voter

[00:34:50] eligibility act and I think it's just critical that we do that but it's not just me who

[00:34:56] thinks it's critical to do this 86 percent of Americans agree on this issue 86 percent including

[00:35:03] over 80 percent of Democrats this is a cross cross-party issue it's it's by part it's not

[00:35:11] even bipartisan it's just an American issue and Americans understand that right yeah it's

[00:35:17] interesting isn't it to see in 2020 all the um role changes where the Democrats who Kamala

[00:35:25] Harris included in 2016 there's testimony or video of her in the Senate talking about

[00:35:32] these election systems being hacked uh and then in 2020 when they win it's the most secure in

[00:35:39] history and that's a lie it's an absolute lie but uh it's served their political purpose and

[00:35:46] I think once the American people understand that the parties aren't going to work this as well

[00:35:53] as the citizens do then I think we we can uh we can advance the cause of pure and honest elections

[00:36:04] absolutely so I have two more questions for you the first one is this what would be the first

[00:36:09] thing you do or for a series of things that you would do when you get to Washington if

[00:36:14] you're elected okay it all comes down to electing a conservative speaker because we have

[00:36:22] to find the man or woman that will take on that role that will schedule this uh

[00:36:30] make America great agenda and uh we'll start passing budgets for the each individual department

[00:36:39] we'll talk we're going to have to work with Trump uh President Trump very quickly to figure

[00:36:45] out which departments we can eliminate downsize freeze hold in place whatever but those would be

[00:36:53] the things let's get a speaker in there and then let's start working budgets one thing I'd

[00:36:58] like to see on our budgeting process and frankly the legislative process is one issue per

[00:37:04] bill and with a citizen summary page and an expiration date on every single bill this Congress

[00:37:12] in my estimation ought to be spending as much or more time determining whether old bills need

[00:37:20] to be renewed or rejected that should become the schedule not all this new legislation

[00:37:27] that everybody wants to put their name on and a beautiful funny acronym and all that

[00:37:31] let's get this government smaller we don't even know what it spends right now so

[00:37:37] this Congress should be spending time tearing it down figuring out where all this money went to

[00:37:46] those are very good things to work on and I'm glad that that is what you would be working on

[00:37:50] all right the very last question is this who is your favorite founding father

[00:37:56] well I guess it's always Jefferson because uh been to Monticello a few times and uh I

[00:38:02] appreciate uh God what a what a breadth of knowledge and interest he had and I

[00:38:10] and what a writer so I guess it would be him but you know uh we were just talking about

[00:38:16] John Adams interaction with Thomas Jefferson last night and wondering why there was any

[00:38:23] friction you know we're looking at uh in some ways I feel like the people that we're dealing

[00:38:28] with now are refounding this nation and you know now we know firsthand kind of the interplay

[00:38:35] and interrelational uh issues but you wonder why those great men back 250 years ago had any

[00:38:45] kind of interpersonal problems because they're all so monumental you know yes that is true but

[00:38:53] they also are are men yeah and we understand the nature of of men and sometimes that is to

[00:39:00] bicker among ourselves about things that later don't even seem very important yeah true very

[00:39:05] true um well thank you so much for joining us now if people want to get in follow your

[00:39:12] campaign get involved where should they go how can they learn a little bit more about you

[00:39:16] sure I'd be grateful if they did uh best place to find anything out about me is

[00:39:22] hanksforcolorado.com and it's hanks for colorado.com um I put up a lot of reports like a

[00:39:33] terror report of my assessment as a military guy about the threats were under taking you

[00:39:40] know data from other experts I've gone to the border I've written reports on it there's a

[00:39:46] lot of material on there that kind of a little bit larger than the average campaign and I'd invite

[00:39:53] people to take a look at that and uh I'm grateful for the time on your show and grateful

[00:39:57] for the things that you've done I think we've crossed paths a few times I'm not sure our

[00:40:02] paths ever bumped but we were within a few feet of each other so it's good to have the

[00:40:07] time on here and thank you for it well thank you so much thanks for stepping up to

[00:40:12] run I wish you luck and I hope that everyone goes and checks out your website at hanksforcolorado.com

[00:40:19] thanks so much for joining me today Ron thank you ma'am thank you very much the Jenny Beth

[00:40:23] show is hosted by Jenny Beth Martin produced by Kevin Munihan and directed by Luke Livingston

[00:40:31] the Jenny Beth show is a production of Tea Party Patriots Action

[00:40:35] for more information visit TeaPartyPatriots.org

water rights,america first,agriculture and food supply,donald trump,make america great again,tea party patriots action,election integrity,national security,pro-america agenda,tea party patriots,voter id,border security,hanks for colorado,energy independence,donald j trump,military service,jenny beth martin,conservative values,colorado,proof of citizenship,jenny beth,american manufacturing,federal land grabs,ron hanks,