An Overturned Election, Defending Trump in GA, & Running for Office | Charlice Byrd, State Rep., GA
The Jenny Beth ShowMay 22, 2024x
67
00:48:3944.88 MB

An Overturned Election, Defending Trump in GA, & Running for Office | Charlice Byrd, State Rep., GA

Jenny Beth sits down with an old friend Georgia State Representative Charlice Byrd who also Chairs the State Freedom Caucus in Georgia. Charlice is a staunch conservative who often stands alone for what she believes to be right in the Georgia State Legislature. Tune in to hear some of her experiences, how she has defended President Trump on the state level, and her tips for what it takes to run for office.

Twitter/X: @charlice_byrd | @jennybethm

Website: https://charlicebyrd.com/

[00:00:00] We need transparency more than ever when we are talking about election integrity.

[00:00:05] It's one of the rights that people fought and died for, and it should be taken care of,

[00:00:11] and we should be talking about all of the integrity that goes with an election, and we are not.

[00:00:16] It's concerning because so many of our leaders are failing to do their job.

[00:00:22] Keeping our republic is on the line, and it requires patriots with great passion,

[00:00:27] dedication, and eternal vigilance to preserve our freedoms.

[00:00:31] Jenny Beth Martin is the co-founder of Tea Party Patriots.

[00:00:35] She is an author, a filmmaker, and one of Time Magazine's most influential people in the world.

[00:00:41] But the title she is most proud of is mom to her boy-girl twins.

[00:00:45] She has been at the forefront, fighting to protect America's core principles for more than a decade.

[00:00:52] Welcome to The Jenny Beth Show.

[00:00:54] Charlie Sprint, thank you so much for being with me today.

[00:00:57] Thank you for having me. I look forward to our conversation.

[00:01:00] I do too. I'm so excited to have you.

[00:01:02] We go back so long working on elections really since both of us moved to Cherokee County, Georgia,

[00:01:09] and you have a lot of experience with election integrity-related issues personally that I want to talk about today.

[00:01:17] And then also you're part of the Georgia Freedom Caucus.

[00:01:22] We interviewed Andy Roth before, and I just think it's really important that you talk about what you're doing in Georgia

[00:01:31] and how you're trying to make a difference with conservative values.

[00:01:34] Absolutely. The election integrity is very important to all of us.

[00:01:40] And back in 2004, when I started running, we had an election and it was the primary election.

[00:01:52] There were two other people in it. Two of us came out as...

[00:01:59] The top winners.

[00:02:00] Correct. Thank you.

[00:02:02] The top vote contenders or whatever.

[00:02:03] Yes. So we had to run in a runoff.

[00:02:07] During the runoff, there was an incident in Cherokee County.

[00:02:12] There was actually a shooting and my opponent claimed that it kept people from going to vote.

[00:02:21] She took it to a court. The judge overturned the election.

[00:02:26] Which she had won by four votes. Four votes.

[00:02:29] Four votes. So that's why it's important for everyone to go and cast their ballot.

[00:02:33] After that, I had to run all over again and start from scratch knocking doors.

[00:02:39] That particular election probably knocked on 15,000 plus doors.

[00:02:43] So we had the runoff. And the second time I won, I had 132 votes beating her because of all of the hoopla

[00:02:54] of going through a court system, overturning my election, starting from scratch again.

[00:02:59] And I think the people of the community were very upset because it meant more taxpayer dollars

[00:03:05] that we were spending on election integrity, which of course is important.

[00:03:09] It is important. I was in the courtroom as you went through all of that.

[00:03:17] I was there every single day because we'd gone door to door together every single day before that.

[00:03:22] But what I learned during that time, and one of the things that was so important is that your opponent

[00:03:29] brought forward, you won by four votes, and she brought forward like 12 or 20 people who were witnesses

[00:03:35] who said they had some sort of problem voting.

[00:03:37] And she was not in any way contending that there was fraud.

[00:03:41] So there was no evidence of fraud. That wasn't what the claim was.

[00:03:44] But in Georgia, I think the code is OCGA 21-2-522.

[00:03:49] It may be wrong, but I think that's what it is.

[00:03:51] It says that an election may be contested due to fraud, misconduct, or irregularities

[00:03:58] that cast doubt on the outcome of the election.

[00:04:03] And she was looking at irregularities that casted doubt on the outcome of the election,

[00:04:09] and she brought forward 12 or 20 people, but 12 is greater than 4,

[00:04:14] and they all said that they had problems.

[00:04:17] And the judge wouldn't let them tell how they would have voted,

[00:04:20] so they could have voted for you, but that was irrelevant.

[00:04:22] It was just that they had a problem voting,

[00:04:25] and it was more than the margin of vote difference between the two races,

[00:04:30] and so he overturned the election according to state law.

[00:04:34] And now we have people in Georgia who are indicted for challenging an election

[00:04:39] under the same thing that happened to you.

[00:04:41] It's just crazy, and I think that it is the same,

[00:04:46] it's applying the same law, and it's legal to contest an election.

[00:04:50] We have to remember now we are living under a two-justice system,

[00:04:55] and it is, I guess I would consider it's Republicans against Democrats,

[00:05:01] the left or the right,

[00:05:04] and they are challenging those types of things in the court system,

[00:05:07] which I believe is bogus. It is a witch hunt, all those sorts of things,

[00:05:14] but yet nothing's being done about that particular election,

[00:05:18] and we're still talking 2020.

[00:05:20] And we are about to take on the 2024 election,

[00:05:23] and it is very disconcerting because there are still many people

[00:05:27] that are concerned about how their vote and how it will be counted.

[00:05:32] Are we going to have fair and honest elections?

[00:05:35] And we have to sort that out immediately.

[00:05:38] That's right, and there were a lot of problems in Georgia

[00:05:42] and other states around the country.

[00:05:45] We've worked to make sure that we've got poll watchers in place in Georgia,

[00:05:49] and we urge everyone to step up and actually be a poll worker,

[00:05:54] to work the poll rather than being a poll watcher,

[00:05:57] but if they can't work it then be a poll watcher to get involved.

[00:06:01] But there are broader issues, like in Georgia we've got

[00:06:04] a bit of a problem right now, which we're talking about

[00:06:07] with the United States Postal Service and the delivery

[00:06:11] because they've changed. What all has gone on with that?

[00:06:15] You know that better than me. Explain that.

[00:06:17] It is my understanding that they wanted to build a new facility,

[00:06:21] and they have placed it in Palmetto.

[00:06:24] Palmetto is in the airport south area of Fulton County.

[00:06:28] It has been built. They've put all the equipment inside that building.

[00:06:32] However, nothing is working.

[00:06:35] At this point it is my understanding that they are going to shut that down

[00:06:40] for now because if you can't have mail that is processed in a timely manner,

[00:06:47] how are we ever going to get absentee ballots through the mail process?

[00:06:52] Yeah, it's very, very concerning, and it's good news to know

[00:06:56] that they're doing something to revert back to the old system

[00:06:59] or to make sure that mail is processing properly.

[00:07:02] And then we've got to make sure people know how to deal with it,

[00:07:05] especially in Georgia, that there is an issue.

[00:07:07] So they know how to, that there are alternative methods

[00:07:10] to return their absentee ballot if they have to vote absentee

[00:07:14] or to go vote early. We have three weeks of early voting in Georgia.

[00:07:17] That's correct. I mean, I remember the days when there was

[00:07:20] 45 days of early voting, and I was concerned at that time

[00:07:25] because the Constitution said you're supposed to have one day of voting,

[00:07:30] and if it means giving everyone a holiday, that's what we should go back to

[00:07:34] so that we know exactly who is voting instead of the whole absentee process

[00:07:39] or having excuses of why you are not going to show up at the poll in person.

[00:07:45] I'm all about in-person voting.

[00:07:47] So I mean, we continue to work on those things at the state level,

[00:07:50] but we opened a Pandora's box when we started the boxes in various locations,

[00:07:58] drop boxes. And to me, a drop box all these years was called the mailbox.

[00:08:03] Right.

[00:08:04] And so now we have all these drop boxes.

[00:08:06] The good news is that at least they're under surveillance now with cameras,

[00:08:11] and so we actually know how many people are coming in there

[00:08:14] and dropping their ballots off.

[00:08:16] Me personally, I am still against the drop boxes,

[00:08:18] but I'm only one in maybe a handful at the Capitol.

[00:08:22] And then at the Capitol this past legislative session,

[00:08:27] there were changes to election law. What happened with that?

[00:08:31] Everyone has been discussing this for years of what they would like to see.

[00:08:36] One of them was getting rid of the QR code because no one really understood

[00:08:40] what did it say. You can't test it to know what it states on that QR code.

[00:08:45] We also made the decision to put a watermark on paper.

[00:08:50] That was another request from a lot of board of elections and people in the

[00:08:55] community because they were concerned once again about their ballot.

[00:08:59] So those are a couple of things that we have done.

[00:09:02] We also said that any citizen who had a concern about the election,

[00:09:08] that they would have the ability to, whether it's a lawsuit or challenge it

[00:09:13] themselves, which is also a good thing because I'm sure there would have

[00:09:16] been a lot of other people that would have liked to challenged that

[00:09:21] particular box or the boxes that everybody brought in.

[00:09:25] So we're moving in the right direction.

[00:09:28] The bad news is what we have done this year and what the governor has

[00:09:34] signed does not become effective until 2026.

[00:09:38] Wow. So we still have to work through the system that we had in 2022 right now,

[00:09:45] which is an improvement over 2020 but not as good as what it will be

[00:09:50] in a couple years from now.

[00:09:51] That's right.

[00:09:52] Okay. Now you're part of the Georgia Freedom Caucus, which is part of

[00:09:57] the overall state Freedom Caucus network.

[00:10:00] What do you do with that and explain what your role is and how that is helpful?

[00:10:07] We started a state Freedom Caucus.

[00:10:09] We were the very first state that made the decision to have a network

[00:10:16] and, excuse me, a caucus.

[00:10:19] It started because we needed to lean farther right and possibly get people

[00:10:24] that are kind of middle-of-the-road Republicans to maybe think about their

[00:10:27] vote more often before voting.

[00:10:30] So the-

[00:10:31] Legislators, not just voters.

[00:10:33] Correct. Sorry. Yes, it was legislators.

[00:10:36] The Freedom Caucus started in 2021.

[00:10:40] I was a founding member of the Freedom Caucus, and it has worked well

[00:10:46] in some instances.

[00:10:47] We have a long ways to go.

[00:10:49] We are very small, but our main purpose is to drive other legislators

[00:10:58] to think in terms of the four pillars that we go by before casting a vote.

[00:11:04] One is, does it grow government?

[00:11:06] Does it raise taxes?

[00:11:08] Does it increase regulation?

[00:11:10] And does it infringe on personal liberties?

[00:11:13] Those things that after I read a bill, I put in a box to consider how

[00:11:19] any of those relate to those four pillars.

[00:11:22] But I also add a fifth pillar for myself, and that is what is the

[00:11:27] proper role of government?

[00:11:29] We are so beyond the proper role of government right now, whether it's

[00:11:33] the state of Georgia, across the country.

[00:11:36] Technically, the Constitution told us it was to protect, defend, and

[00:11:41] preserve.

[00:11:42] Nothing else, nothing more.

[00:11:44] To protect us, military, police force, sheriffs, you name it, to

[00:11:48] protect us, defend all those sorts of things.

[00:11:51] But now we are spending money at a state level that is unbelievable

[00:11:55] for things that should have never been paid for.

[00:11:59] So we are trying to move other Republican legislators to think in

[00:12:06] those terms instead of giving every single dollar of new revenue that

[00:12:11] comes in to add it to some new program.

[00:12:14] And are you reading bills?

[00:12:18] How does it function when you're in session?

[00:12:23] Sure.

[00:12:24] We have a director of the State Freedom Caucus, and we have a policy

[00:12:28] director.

[00:12:29] The gentleman that is the policy director reads every single bill.

[00:12:34] Doesn't matter whether it's going to a committee or not.

[00:12:37] It's just whatever bill is around, he starts reading it.

[00:12:41] I only read the bills that are coming to the floor for a House

[00:12:44] vote and or the bills that are in my committees.

[00:12:48] There are 48-plus committees in the House, and it's very

[00:12:51] difficult to prepare for all 48 committees.

[00:12:54] So I only focus on my own committees.

[00:12:57] Then the second step is if it's coming to the floor for a vote, I

[00:13:02] make sure I reread the bill, make sure that there have been no

[00:13:06] changes.

[00:13:07] But on the same hand, the policy director and I are

[00:13:11] communicating.

[00:13:12] He takes a summary of the bill, and he tells me exactly what is

[00:13:16] in there.

[00:13:18] He gives the pros and the cons, and he takes the four pillars.

[00:13:23] And if it fits into any of those pillars, he said this is a no vote.

[00:13:28] However, I want you to understand it doesn't mean that's how I am

[00:13:32] going to vote.

[00:13:33] It is his suggestion of how we make the four pillars.

[00:13:37] There are occasions that does not work, and there are also

[00:13:40] occasions that he and I get into a discussion of what I believe, of

[00:13:44] why it should be voted on or why it should be a no.

[00:13:47] And is that working well for you?

[00:13:50] Because you were a state legislator before there was the

[00:13:52] State Freedom Caucus, and now you're one with it.

[00:13:55] How do you think it helps support the role of a legislator?

[00:13:59] Back in the days when I served from 05 to 2012, we did have

[00:14:05] a group very similar to the Georgia Freedom Caucus, and at

[00:14:10] the time it was called the 216 Club, and it was only because

[00:14:14] it was a room that we met in.

[00:14:16] Room 216.

[00:14:17] That's exactly right.

[00:14:19] We read those bills as a group.

[00:14:22] We had lively debate, but we did a negative one and a

[00:14:26] positive one, but with five different pillars.

[00:14:29] So we would discuss those.

[00:14:31] We would then rate them, and it was still up to each

[00:14:34] individual of how they needed to vote, whether it was the

[00:14:37] way it fit into your district or the way you believed in

[00:14:41] what the bill was saying.

[00:14:42] And so the Georgia Freedom Caucus is almost identical to

[00:14:46] what we did back in 2012 when we rated all of those bills.

[00:14:51] It does work.

[00:14:52] It helps immensely.

[00:14:54] We haven't convinced everyone of those four pillars, and

[00:15:00] there are this year that there were a few legislators

[00:15:04] that came and asked me how I was voting.

[00:15:07] I explained the bill, why I was voting the way I was, and so

[00:15:10] it kind of helped them.

[00:15:12] It didn't mean that they were voting the same way I was,

[00:15:15] but at least they understood really what the Georgia

[00:15:18] Freedom Caucus was representing.

[00:15:20] And was that a problem before?

[00:15:23] Did they not understand what you were representing?

[00:15:25] And it seems to me like one of the things with what

[00:15:29] you're describing, and maybe the House Freedom Caucus does

[00:15:33] the same thing, but I haven't seen it explained so succinctly.

[00:15:37] When you just, when you say these are the four things we're

[00:15:40] evaluating each bill on or five things, it provides a lot

[00:15:44] of clarity for how you're going to be voting.

[00:15:47] It does.

[00:15:48] It helps immensely.

[00:15:49] We have a white paper that our policy director gives

[00:15:54] to me and a couple of other people during the day before

[00:16:00] or either that morning so that we can have real clarity

[00:16:03] while I am reading my own bill.

[00:16:06] Because there are too many people in the House that do not

[00:16:09] read the bills.

[00:16:10] They have no idea what is in the bill.

[00:16:13] They go and vote one way or the other, and then I, on

[00:16:17] occasion, question why did you vote for that?

[00:16:21] Or they'll come over to me and say, well, why did you

[00:16:23] vote no?

[00:16:24] And then I give them a very clear, concise reason why

[00:16:28] I voted no and that's why they should have voted no as well.

[00:16:33] That hasn't worked yet, but more and more people are

[00:16:36] understanding what the Freedom Caucus represents.

[00:16:39] I think that's good.

[00:16:41] And it's small right now.

[00:16:44] Hopefully it grows in the coming years.

[00:16:48] That's our plan.

[00:16:49] Yesterday I was on a two-hour conference call with our

[00:16:52] Freedom Caucus to talk about those things, a long-term,

[00:16:56] short-term strategy.

[00:16:57] We're kind of in a down period now because school is about

[00:17:01] to end.

[00:17:02] Everybody's involved in graduation trying to get people

[00:17:04] to go and do their voting for the primary election.

[00:17:08] But once that's over, it's going to give us about 60 days

[00:17:11] to refresh and renew.

[00:17:13] Start hard again in August so we can start talking about

[00:17:17] what exactly is our mission?

[00:17:19] What is it that we want to accomplish come January?

[00:17:22] What is it do we want to share with the rest of our

[00:17:24] legislators?

[00:17:25] Do we want to share our white papers with them, everybody or

[00:17:29] just the ones that are more interested in why we vote the

[00:17:33] way we do?

[00:17:35] So those are the things that we are discussing now because

[00:17:39] nothing would be more important than to grow.

[00:17:42] When you have a strong group of individuals in the House of

[00:17:48] 180 of us or 102 Republicans, you may then be able to sway

[00:17:53] everybody to vote the best way possible to represent the

[00:17:57] state of Georgia.

[00:17:58] That's I think really important because we need more

[00:18:01] conservative legislation in a red state.

[00:18:04] And it seems like a problem that many red states are

[00:18:07] actually having.

[00:18:08] They are a red state, but then oftentimes the

[00:18:12] legislation that's passing isn't as conservative as you

[00:18:15] would think would come out of a red state.

[00:18:17] That's correct.

[00:18:19] People I find that all of my friends that I sit with in the

[00:18:25] House chamber are all good people, but they're not

[00:18:29] considering the long-term outcomes when they pass a bill.

[00:18:33] They don't know what the unintended consequences are,

[00:18:35] and we're constantly going back the next session to put a

[00:18:39] band-aid on the unintended consequences.

[00:18:42] We have to have another bill to fix that unintended

[00:18:45] consequences.

[00:18:46] And across the state right now, there are 11 Freedom Caucuses.

[00:18:51] Across the country?

[00:18:53] Across the country, sorry.

[00:18:54] Across the country.

[00:18:56] And they are having just as many problems as we are.

[00:18:59] They have more numbers in their caucus, but the probably

[00:19:05] more moderate people that are in their chambers don't want

[00:19:10] their input.

[00:19:12] They don't want to cause waves because they don't want the

[00:19:16] people to know what is really going on under that gold dome,

[00:19:19] as most people don't.

[00:19:21] They think they were insulated and they don't have to worry

[00:19:25] about the people that are outside that you were supposed

[00:19:27] to be representing and who voted you in office.

[00:19:30] Places like Idaho, I believe it is, that they were...

[00:19:35] It's funny because that's exactly what I was thinking about.

[00:19:37] Go ahead.

[00:19:38] Yes.

[00:19:39] They actually, the Speaker of their House, removed all of

[00:19:43] their furniture so they couldn't even have any kind of

[00:19:46] meeting in their own office.

[00:19:48] Now that guy did not vote for those legislators.

[00:19:53] It was their districts that voted and obviously they want

[00:19:56] them in that seat.

[00:19:58] So for someone to cut them out is absolutely ludicrous.

[00:20:03] Exactly what they did to Senator Colton Moore right

[00:20:07] here in Georgia.

[00:20:09] The Republican caucus in the Senate voted to remove him

[00:20:13] from the caucus because they didn't want him causing them

[00:20:17] issues in their district when he was out there touting

[00:20:20] what exactly was going on with their votes.

[00:20:23] Speaking of Colton Moore and some of the things that

[00:20:27] expose the differences that you guys do versus others in

[00:20:32] the state legislature, you and I and Colton spoke at

[00:20:36] a press conference last summer, late summer after the

[00:20:41] indictments in Georgia and you guys were pushing for

[00:20:44] the impeachment of Fannie Willis or at least you

[00:20:46] bring the potential articles of impeachment to debate

[00:20:50] it in the chambers.

[00:20:52] And there were not really any other members of the

[00:20:57] House standing with you or the Senate standing with

[00:20:59] him.

[00:21:00] Why is that?

[00:21:01] One, they don't want to get involved.

[00:21:04] One, they don't believe that there was any fraud so

[00:21:08] there was no reason to do anything against former

[00:21:13] President Trump.

[00:21:16] We started a letter in August of last year and asked

[00:21:21] our House members and Senate members to sign on so

[00:21:25] that we could start a process against Fannie Willis.

[00:21:29] Not one person signed on.

[00:21:31] They were sent to the governor, it was sent to the

[00:21:34] attorney general and we asked all of our House

[00:21:36] members.

[00:21:37] No one wanted to participate.

[00:21:39] I mean who knows why?

[00:21:41] Everybody has their own reason.

[00:21:43] They don't want to be seen in the limelight trying

[00:21:45] to cause trouble.

[00:21:46] This is why we have been elected not to sit on

[00:21:49] the sideline.

[00:21:50] I then filed a resolution for impeachment of Fannie

[00:21:55] Willis because it has, impeachment comes from

[00:21:58] the House side and then the Senate must do the

[00:22:01] investigation.

[00:22:02] So, but unfortunately no one wanted to hear my

[00:22:08] resolution in the House because they didn't want

[00:22:13] the limelight to be shining on them of reasons

[00:22:17] why they weren't taking this up.

[00:22:20] So there I sat all by myself with the articles

[00:22:23] of impeachment and now look where we are and

[00:22:26] Fannie Willis being investigated in all sorts of

[00:22:29] ways you would think one would say I wonder why

[00:22:33] we didn't impeach her when we could.

[00:22:36] Right and what you were doing in late last summer

[00:22:40] after the indictments in Georgia came out and for

[00:22:43] those who are not aware the indictments included

[00:22:45] President Trump along with people who were electors

[00:22:49] in Georgia and attorneys and people who worked

[00:22:52] for him in the White House and others, some of them

[00:22:56] seem rather random from other parts of the

[00:22:58] country who wound up being indicted for

[00:23:01] challenging an election which is legal in Georgia

[00:23:05] and happened to you and an election was

[00:23:07] actually overturned of your election.

[00:23:12] What you are trying to do is beyond just what

[00:23:15] is happening to President Trump and those who

[00:23:17] are indicted.

[00:23:18] It is protecting the integrity of the entire

[00:23:22] system.

[00:23:23] All of those people whether they are Republican

[00:23:26] or Democrat they may be in the same boat at

[00:23:28] some point and need to challenge an election.

[00:23:30] There may be true irregularities that happen

[00:23:33] where they need the court to take a look at

[00:23:37] what happened and determine is it enough

[00:23:39] that it creates and casts doubt on the outcome

[00:23:43] of the election and should the election be

[00:23:45] overturned or not.

[00:23:47] But when we turn legal activity into crimes

[00:23:50] it really creates a problem for the entire system.

[00:23:53] It does indeed.

[00:23:55] Certainly there were people like Al Gore,

[00:24:00] Hillary Clinton, Stacey Abrams said exactly

[00:24:04] the same thing that President Trump said

[00:24:06] that there was issues with the election.

[00:24:10] There was nothing done to them because they

[00:24:13] called people out on the election.

[00:24:17] So to me this is once again the double standards

[00:24:20] that we are living under right now.

[00:24:22] We are also talking about our First Amendment right.

[00:24:25] All they did was state that there were some

[00:24:28] misgivings about the election.

[00:24:32] I don't know that they ever used the word

[00:24:34] fraud.

[00:24:35] They were just expressing themselves to the

[00:24:38] public that they had grave concern about the

[00:24:41] election process.

[00:24:42] So if we are now looking at what they are

[00:24:45] doing to those people, former President Trump

[00:24:48] and the 18 other people that were indicted as

[00:24:51] well, then we all should be concerned because

[00:24:54] at any time someone could knock on our door

[00:24:57] and accuse us of anything and we could go

[00:24:59] the same route.

[00:25:01] That's exactly right.

[00:25:03] So your letter was calling for a special

[00:25:06] session of the legislature to look into

[00:25:09] whether an impeachment article should even be

[00:25:12] introduced or not.

[00:25:13] So it was a special session and it requires a

[00:25:16] super majority or the act of a governor to

[00:25:19] have a special session in Georgia.

[00:25:21] And then during the session they didn't want

[00:25:23] to hear anything about it and towards the

[00:25:26] end of the session they were doing some

[00:25:29] investigations in the Senate into Fannie

[00:25:33] Willis and her behavior because Michael Roman,

[00:25:38] who is one of the people who has been

[00:25:40] indicted and his attorney and then others

[00:25:42] afterwards have raised legitimate concerns

[00:25:46] about whether there were conflicts of

[00:25:48] interest with what she did.

[00:25:50] And now the appeals court is going to hear,

[00:25:55] it just seems like there's always this

[00:25:57] desire to just sort of kick the can,

[00:25:59] it's like a hot potato, it's not even

[00:26:01] kicking the can down the road, it's like

[00:26:02] I don't want to touch it, let me throw

[00:26:03] it away to someone else because nobody

[00:26:05] wants the responsibility of having to deal

[00:26:07] with it if it's in their hand.

[00:26:08] But you were willing to.

[00:26:10] Indeed, going back to the whole election

[00:26:13] integrity part of it, if we don't stand

[00:26:16] up and take a strong stand against

[00:26:20] these types of things, what's going to

[00:26:22] happen in the future?

[00:26:23] I mean look what we're fighting now

[00:26:25] and what may happen in November.

[00:26:27] We have no idea.

[00:26:28] I mean I know every day it seems like

[00:26:30] we are talking to more people in the

[00:26:33] district and they are still very

[00:26:35] concerned of how their vote will be

[00:26:37] counted, whether it's going to go in a

[00:26:39] box and it will never be seen.

[00:26:41] We need transparency more than ever

[00:26:44] when we are talking about election

[00:26:46] integrity.

[00:26:47] It's one of the rights that people

[00:26:49] fought and died for, men and women

[00:26:51] went out and are protecting the

[00:26:53] freedoms of this country and that is

[00:26:55] one of the freedoms that we fought

[00:26:56] for, for the ability to go out and

[00:26:58] vote and it should be taken care of

[00:27:00] and we should be talking about all of

[00:27:03] the integrity that goes with an

[00:27:04] election and we are not.

[00:27:06] And that's, that is concerning because

[00:27:10] so many of our leaders are failing to

[00:27:12] do their job.

[00:27:13] It's true and leadership isn't fun

[00:27:18] sometimes.

[00:27:19] Like you have to make the tough

[00:27:21] decisions.

[00:27:22] Sometimes you have to do things that

[00:27:23] your friends don't like because

[00:27:25] you're doing what's right or you're

[00:27:27] trying to get people to follow or

[00:27:29] you know it's what is expected of

[00:27:33] you.

[00:27:34] And it's tough.

[00:27:36] Sometimes it's really tough and when

[00:27:38] you do that all of the attention and

[00:27:41] there is positive attention of course

[00:27:43] but also negative attention, zeros in

[00:27:46] on you and you start taking a lot

[00:27:48] of flack for it.

[00:27:50] And you and Colton experienced that

[00:27:52] last summer.

[00:27:53] We certainly have.

[00:27:54] There's a lot of arrows that are

[00:27:55] thrown for sure.

[00:27:57] You have to be strong in who you

[00:27:59] are and you have to be strong in

[00:28:01] what you believe because when you

[00:28:03] take on those types of people, you

[00:28:05] know that at some point there could

[00:28:07] be consequences.

[00:28:08] You never know.

[00:28:09] I have to say from the house side

[00:28:11] they have not removed me from the

[00:28:13] caucus.

[00:28:14] They, that would be to me a

[00:28:17] huge mistake removing you from your

[00:28:19] own caucus.

[00:28:20] It brings even more highlight to

[00:28:22] someone that has removed Colton

[00:28:24] Moore from his caucus.

[00:28:26] It puts them all in a bad light

[00:28:28] because they have now taken action

[00:28:30] against one of their own.

[00:28:32] He stands alone in the Senate all

[00:28:34] the time.

[00:28:35] I have to applaud him.

[00:28:37] He is extremely outspoken and he

[00:28:39] stands upright every single day.

[00:28:41] Doesn't matter how many arrows he's

[00:28:43] taken and I just applaud and

[00:28:45] appreciate him for what he is doing

[00:28:47] from the Senate side and he stands

[00:28:49] with me from the house side and we

[00:28:51] together continue to hold each other

[00:28:53] up.

[00:28:54] We just have to be strong.

[00:28:56] We just enjoy each other's company

[00:28:58] and we know it's a difficult task

[00:29:00] but someone has to do it because if

[00:29:02] not things will remain the same.

[00:29:04] That is correct.

[00:29:06] Now, I want to, you remember how

[00:29:08] you just said it your previously,

[00:29:11] Sue, you were elected from 2004,

[00:29:14] you were elected in 2004 and began

[00:29:16] in 2005 and stayed in office

[00:29:19] through the end of 2012 and you

[00:29:22] lost an election and then you

[00:29:24] went back and ran again later which

[00:29:27] must have been not a fun decision

[00:29:29] for you to make.

[00:29:31] You knew the positives and the

[00:29:33] negatives of it but you still did

[00:29:35] that and I'm glad that you did.

[00:29:37] But back then you met in room 216

[00:29:40] and I'm not saying that the

[00:29:42] current speaker or the current

[00:29:44] House leadership had anything to do

[00:29:46] with this but didn't you guys get

[00:29:48] kicked out of a room in the

[00:29:50] house?

[00:29:52] We did.

[00:29:54] We used room 216 and there was a

[00:29:57] legislator that wanted a bill to

[00:29:59] come to the house floor to pass

[00:30:01] and hopefully to pass and it was

[00:30:03] about tax cuts.

[00:30:05] The Speaker of the House at the

[00:30:07] time, they made a deal and the

[00:30:10] deal was that you give up the

[00:30:12] 216 club and move on and I will

[00:30:16] let your bill come to the house

[00:30:17] floor for a vote.

[00:30:19] So there were many that scattered

[00:30:22] because they did not want to be

[00:30:24] associated any longer with the

[00:30:26] 216 so there were probably at the

[00:30:29] time maybe two handfuls, about 10

[00:30:32] people that stuck to it where we

[00:30:34] still met every single morning to

[00:30:36] discuss the bills that were coming

[00:30:38] to the house floor for a vote.

[00:30:40] But again that dwindled as well

[00:30:42] because one, people didn't have the

[00:30:44] time to put together the

[00:30:47] read all the bills that we were

[00:30:49] going to discuss.

[00:30:50] They didn't want the leadership to

[00:30:52] know they were still part of it

[00:30:54] because everybody, a lot of people

[00:30:56] at the Capitol want to be in the

[00:30:58] inner circle and if you are

[00:31:01] outside of the inner circle and

[00:31:03] you have been told not to do

[00:31:04] something and then you continue to

[00:31:06] do it, you are going to be

[00:31:08] excommunicated.

[00:31:09] That's not good.

[00:31:10] And in Idaho they're really

[00:31:12] finding that out.

[00:31:13] They are.

[00:31:14] I mean it's horrible and

[00:31:16] the leadership must remember that

[00:31:19] we were voted by our district.

[00:31:22] There is not one person under the

[00:31:24] gold dome that votes for me.

[00:31:26] But I do vote for them.

[00:31:28] One is like the governor,

[00:31:30] lieutenant governor, those people

[00:31:31] and also we have to vote for

[00:31:33] the speaker of the house.

[00:31:34] So those are the votes that I

[00:31:36] cast.

[00:31:37] They don't vote for me so I

[00:31:38] should be standing for my

[00:31:40] community and my district and my

[00:31:42] county to know exactly what they

[00:31:45] want, not what the people in the

[00:31:47] gold dome want.

[00:31:48] And you do that well and you

[00:31:51] have gone door to door to get

[00:31:53] elected.

[00:31:54] I think a lot of the others in

[00:31:57] the Capitol haven't done that so

[00:31:59] they haven't had those face to

[00:32:01] face conversations with the

[00:32:03] constituents the same way that

[00:32:05] you have, not that they're not

[00:32:07] having conversations but at the

[00:32:08] door it's much different than

[00:32:10] seeing someone in the grocery

[00:32:11] store doing a town hall

[00:32:12] meeting and then you also are

[00:32:13] very involved with town hall

[00:32:14] meetings and updating your

[00:32:16] constituents and staying in

[00:32:18] touch and listening to them.

[00:32:20] I do.

[00:32:21] It's very important once you

[00:32:22] are elected, you need to let

[00:32:24] everyone know what is going on

[00:32:26] at the Capitol.

[00:32:27] So having a town hall meeting

[00:32:29] once a week or monthly for

[00:32:32] sure and then having going into

[00:32:35] districts to meet with HOAs

[00:32:38] just giving you the ability to

[00:32:40] have time to talk.

[00:32:41] I belong to civic organizations

[00:32:43] and they proudly let me speak on

[00:32:46] what's going on.

[00:32:47] And it's not to talk about

[00:32:49] whether it's right or wrong or

[00:32:50] good or bad.

[00:32:51] It's just what this is very

[00:32:53] informational.

[00:32:54] And I think that is important

[00:32:55] so that your constituents know

[00:32:57] who you are and what you were

[00:32:58] doing for them.

[00:32:59] I put things in three silos as

[00:33:03] a state legislator.

[00:33:05] One is by constitution, Georgia

[00:33:08] Constitution, we must pass a

[00:33:09] budget.

[00:33:10] Number two is to pass or appeal

[00:33:12] laws and number three is

[00:33:14] constituent services and the

[00:33:16] constituent services is where

[00:33:18] you are reaching out to your

[00:33:20] community where people come and

[00:33:22] meet you so that they know

[00:33:23] that you are part of their

[00:33:25] community whether you belong to

[00:33:27] civic organizations or the

[00:33:28] Chamber of Commerce or your

[00:33:30] church in Sunday School.

[00:33:31] These are all important things

[00:33:33] if you are going to be

[00:33:35] elected and remain elected

[00:33:37] no one wants you to go into a

[00:33:39] box once you are elected and

[00:33:41] not see you or hear from you.

[00:33:43] So I put out a newsletter on a

[00:33:45] weekly basis.

[00:33:46] I do my own handheld videos so

[00:33:49] that I can tell people about

[00:33:51] a bill and we know that

[00:33:52] everything has to be done in

[00:33:53] short clips.

[00:33:54] So they last for 45 seconds

[00:33:56] just so you can get a general

[00:33:58] sense of it and if you need

[00:33:59] to call and talk to me

[00:34:00] about a bill, I gladly pick up

[00:34:03] that telephone call.

[00:34:04] I tell people that I'm going

[00:34:06] to be a good person and I tell

[00:34:08] people all the time it's a lot

[00:34:10] easier to vote no than it is

[00:34:12] yes because you can justify your

[00:34:14] no a lot easier than you can

[00:34:16] justify your yes.

[00:34:18] It's elaborate on that.

[00:34:20] So the budget, all right?

[00:34:23] We have a big budget and a

[00:34:25] little budget.

[00:34:26] Our little budget which is

[00:34:28] called a supplemental budget.

[00:34:29] We do that in March this year

[00:34:33] and then we vote for the large

[00:34:36] budget which is for the budget

[00:34:38] for 2025.

[00:34:39] I am the only no vote.

[00:34:42] It's tough being the only no

[00:34:44] vote on many occasions but if

[00:34:47] we stop funding certain things,

[00:34:50] for instance, the DA's office,

[00:34:53] they wouldn't be able to exist

[00:34:55] but we keep funding those

[00:34:57] kinds of things and then

[00:34:59] another thing is that we give

[00:35:01] raises to everybody who is in

[00:35:03] government.

[00:35:04] No evaluation, no anything but

[00:35:08] everybody across the board gets

[00:35:10] a raise.

[00:35:11] Now if you don't, if the

[00:35:13] budget were never to pass we

[00:35:15] could stop a whole lot of

[00:35:17] stuff but we also have to

[00:35:18] keep in mind people continue

[00:35:20] to vote for the budget because

[00:35:21] they have a little piece in

[00:35:23] their district or getting a new

[00:35:25] healthcare center or a new

[00:35:28] technical school.

[00:35:30] Things that go into your

[00:35:32] district, they want to vote

[00:35:34] for it.

[00:35:35] But I am a no vote and when

[00:35:37] that's what I'm talking about

[00:35:39] it's easier to justify your

[00:35:40] no.

[00:35:41] I know there's a lot of other

[00:35:42] good things in a bill to take

[00:35:44] care of maybe the elderly or a

[00:35:46] child that has a particular

[00:35:48] disease but that is all part of

[00:35:51] the big budget and I can't

[00:35:53] vote for a lot of the bad

[00:35:55] stuff when there is also good

[00:35:57] stuff.

[00:35:58] Transportation is one.

[00:35:59] Sure we just did $2 billion

[00:36:01] worth for transportation but I

[00:36:03] voted no on our budget because

[00:36:05] we need transportation but there

[00:36:07] were too many bad things in

[00:36:09] the bill that I didn't believe

[00:36:11] in.

[00:36:12] I'm glad that you're willing

[00:36:14] to do that and it winds up

[00:36:16] being really tough to explain.

[00:36:18] Why do you keep funding the

[00:36:20] DA's office who is creating a

[00:36:23] two-tiered system of justice

[00:36:25] or other issues that may

[00:36:27] exist that people are voting

[00:36:29] for?

[00:36:30] I think it's harder to justify

[00:36:32] some of it because there's so

[00:36:34] many bad things that wind up

[00:36:36] getting approved.

[00:36:37] That's true.

[00:36:38] There are so many things that

[00:36:40] you probably don't know as a

[00:36:42] taxpayer what we are funding.

[00:36:44] It's astounding and when I

[00:36:46] tell people their eyes just

[00:36:48] become really big and they go

[00:36:50] really?

[00:36:51] That is unbelievable.

[00:36:52] Why are we funding that?

[00:36:54] Because somebody asked for it

[00:36:56] and now we're going to give

[00:36:58] them the money to take back to

[00:37:00] their districts so they can say

[00:37:02] they did a great thing.

[00:37:03] It's crazy.

[00:37:04] It's just crazy.

[00:37:05] It's so frustrating and you

[00:37:06] and I have complained about

[00:37:07] those kind of issues for a

[00:37:09] long, long time.

[00:37:11] You moved here prior to being

[00:37:14] here you were in Hong Kong

[00:37:16] weren't you?

[00:37:17] That's correct.

[00:37:18] And you and your husband were

[00:37:20] there when it changed from

[00:37:22] English control to Chinese

[00:37:24] control.

[00:37:25] Right.

[00:37:26] And weren't you in the League

[00:37:27] of Women Voters?

[00:37:28] Were you the president of the

[00:37:29] League of Women Voters?

[00:37:30] I was.

[00:37:31] I was the president of the

[00:37:32] League of Women Voters in

[00:37:33] Hong Kong but it was very

[00:37:34] different considering League

[00:37:37] of Women Voters here in the

[00:37:39] states.

[00:37:40] Over in Hong Kong we would

[00:37:41] have speakers that would come

[00:37:43] to our meetings.

[00:37:44] It could have been Newt

[00:37:45] Gingrich at the time.

[00:37:46] It could have been the

[00:37:48] Patton was his name at the

[00:37:50] time when I was there but he

[00:37:52] would come and speak and when

[00:37:54] we would meet we would talk

[00:37:55] about various topics from

[00:37:57] everyone's country and how it

[00:37:59] was good, how it was bad,

[00:38:00] what they would do to change

[00:38:01] if they had been duly

[00:38:02] elected.

[00:38:03] So it was a great process to

[00:38:06] learn and prepare for when I

[00:38:07] came back to the states to

[00:38:09] know exactly what my mission

[00:38:10] was, what my God given

[00:38:12] purpose was to get involved

[00:38:14] in the political world.

[00:38:16] Over in Hong Kong things were

[00:38:18] very different of course being

[00:38:19] under British rule.

[00:38:21] It seemed like everything was

[00:38:23] free like America has been in

[00:38:25] the past changing a bit but

[00:38:28] for that time the British, I

[00:38:32] think it was his Prime

[00:38:33] Minister.

[00:38:34] I can't remember if he and

[00:38:37] so it was terrific.

[00:38:39] I mean they had the American

[00:38:40] Club which I think they still

[00:38:41] have the American Club and

[00:38:43] in 1998 when the Chinese

[00:38:46] after their 100 years at

[00:38:48] hate given to the British

[00:38:50] they, we watched the Britannia

[00:38:53] with Prince Charles leave the

[00:38:56] harbor on his yacht and

[00:38:59] watched the military of China

[00:39:03] move in the back door to be

[00:39:05] quietly held in place for

[00:39:08] supposedly another 50 years.

[00:39:10] China was not supposed to come

[00:39:12] and let Hong Kong remain

[00:39:14] their own country, their own

[00:39:17] political system but as we

[00:39:19] know now that did not happen,

[00:39:21] 50 years did not happen.

[00:39:23] It was more like 20 or 25 years

[00:39:25] if I think that's correct.

[00:39:27] So coming back to the states

[00:39:28] after that was set my course

[00:39:31] for the political realm.

[00:39:33] And if somebody is thinking of

[00:39:35] running for office what would you

[00:39:37] recommend?

[00:39:38] Don't do it.

[00:39:39] I knew you were going to say

[00:39:41] that but if they feel like

[00:39:44] they're being called to do

[00:39:46] that or they think they can

[00:39:48] really make a difference, what's

[00:39:50] the kind of advice that you give

[00:39:52] to people who ask you about it?

[00:39:54] Sure.

[00:39:55] One of my favorite quotes these

[00:39:56] days is if you're not at the

[00:39:57] table you're on the menu.

[00:39:59] And that is true for anything.

[00:40:01] And if you really want to make

[00:40:02] change you have to be on the

[00:40:03] inside which is why I ran

[00:40:05] again in 2019.

[00:40:08] So I do tell people that

[00:40:10] number one be sure that you

[00:40:11] understand that you are giving

[00:40:13] up a lot especially family and

[00:40:15] your spouse or your family

[00:40:17] has to be part of it because it

[00:40:18] is a rough road when you want

[00:40:20] to run for office.

[00:40:22] Number two is if you are

[00:40:23] planning a run for office say

[00:40:25] two years from now start

[00:40:27] planning, start joining your

[00:40:29] civic organizations, make sure

[00:40:31] that you're out front at the

[00:40:32] chamber events, making sure

[00:40:34] that you are attending a church

[00:40:36] and going to Sunday school and

[00:40:37] any and everything else to be

[00:40:39] involved in your community.

[00:40:40] Become a political activist as

[00:40:42] well.

[00:40:43] Start going to your meetings

[00:40:45] at the Cherokee County

[00:40:46] Republican Party or any other

[00:40:48] organizations that may have

[00:40:49] politics so that you know what

[00:40:51] is going on so that you can

[00:40:52] intelligently talk about

[00:40:54] issues.

[00:40:56] That would be start it now

[00:40:57] and start early.

[00:40:59] Be prepared in 18 months if

[00:41:02] you are going to run for

[00:41:03] office to know exactly what you

[00:41:05] want to say and what you plan

[00:41:07] to do and why you're running

[00:41:08] for the office.

[00:41:09] Don't just tell me that

[00:41:10] you're running because I've

[00:41:11] always wanted to do this.

[00:41:13] This is not an answer for me.

[00:41:15] May it be, it should be some

[00:41:17] kind of driven reason like

[00:41:19] illegal immigration.

[00:41:20] There is a gentleman that's

[00:41:22] running for office right now

[00:41:24] and one of his family members

[00:41:26] was actually murdered by an

[00:41:28] illegal.

[00:41:29] That's what's motivated him to

[00:41:31] run.

[00:41:32] Find an issue.

[00:41:33] Stick to two or three issues.

[00:41:34] Be prepared for anything and be

[00:41:37] knowledgeable.

[00:41:38] You want more than anything to

[00:41:40] have name recognition.

[00:41:42] You want to have a name

[00:41:43] recognition in the community by

[00:41:45] the time you're ready to step

[00:41:47] in and run for public office.

[00:41:49] That's really good advice.

[00:41:51] Also, you can't take any of

[00:41:53] that for granted, right?

[00:41:54] Because even if you have a

[00:41:56] lot of name recognition or how

[00:41:58] to respond, campaigns wind up

[00:42:01] being very unpredictable.

[00:42:02] Unpredictable one and number

[00:42:04] two is always costly but number

[00:42:06] three you always have to have

[00:42:08] a really good campaign manager

[00:42:09] like Jenny Beth Martin.

[00:42:11] I'm a campaign manager for two

[00:42:14] terms.

[00:42:15] We won, as you can tell because

[00:42:17] I'm sitting here now, and

[00:42:19] without someone that is a

[00:42:21] strong believer in you and

[00:42:23] what you're doing and your

[00:42:25] campaign, you really can't get

[00:42:28] a lot done because you need a

[00:42:30] strong, strong person that

[00:42:32] has been involved in the

[00:42:34] community and political

[00:42:36] activism just as much as you

[00:42:38] as the candidate.

[00:42:39] When you're thinking of that,

[00:42:41] oftentimes, especially in a

[00:42:42] local campaign, the campaign

[00:42:44] manager winds up being someone

[00:42:45] who's local.

[00:42:46] I was just a volunteer.

[00:42:49] But you and that person and

[00:42:52] your spouse all have to have

[00:42:54] very thick skin.

[00:42:55] You can't let things, you

[00:42:57] can't take it personally.

[00:42:58] Even though it's very

[00:42:59] personal, you have to be able

[00:43:00] to just go, it's just a

[00:43:02] campaign and we have to just

[00:43:03] keep plowing through and

[00:43:05] almost put blinders on.

[00:43:07] You do.

[00:43:08] You cannot, and I made this

[00:43:10] promise to myself and to my

[00:43:12] husband that if there was

[00:43:14] anything that upset me that I

[00:43:16] was not going to cry in

[00:43:17] public, I would go home and

[00:43:18] cry.

[00:43:19] If you were angry about

[00:43:21] something and you were about

[00:43:22] to write it down and put it

[00:43:24] in an email or any other

[00:43:25] thing in writing, go home,

[00:43:27] sleep on it, and then

[00:43:29] delete, those kinds of things

[00:43:31] that you have to learn and

[00:43:33] you do have to grow a thick

[00:43:34] skin.

[00:43:35] And I don't believe that it's

[00:43:36] personal against you as an

[00:43:38] individual, but it's really

[00:43:40] the policy or the issue that

[00:43:42] they are so passionate about.

[00:43:44] I am very passionate about a

[00:43:46] lot of issues.

[00:43:47] I am very black and white,

[00:43:49] but there is a lot of people

[00:43:50] that's in between and they

[00:43:52] want to have those

[00:43:53] conversations and you have

[00:43:55] to have, you can agree to

[00:43:57] disagree in a respectful

[00:44:00] manner and you don't have

[00:44:01] to take everything personally

[00:44:03] because you can't, because

[00:44:04] you would spend a lot of

[00:44:05] time denying.

[00:44:06] Right or getting really

[00:44:07] angry and doing foolish

[00:44:09] things.

[00:44:10] Stupid things, yes,

[00:44:11] absolutely.

[00:44:12] I think that's really good

[00:44:13] advice that you laid out

[00:44:16] there and people should

[00:44:17] listen to it.

[00:44:18] And we need more people who

[00:44:19] truly are conservative to

[00:44:20] step up and run for office.

[00:44:23] We do.

[00:44:24] I would love to see many

[00:44:26] more conservatives.

[00:44:28] When you talk about

[00:44:29] conservativism though,

[00:44:31] everybody's definition is

[00:44:32] very different.

[00:44:34] And the only way you're gonna actually know

[00:44:36] if someone is conservative,

[00:44:38] you can say anything on the campaign trail

[00:44:40] until you have to cast those ballots on the screen

[00:44:43] where it's either green or red.

[00:44:45] You then find out how conservative someone is.

[00:44:48] Many of my colleagues call themselves conservatives.

[00:44:51] But when I see their vote,

[00:44:54] I beg to differ on those issues for sure.

[00:44:57] Yeah, and I'm sure that I would differ with him as well.

[00:45:03] But we see the same thing happening in the House

[00:45:06] and the Senate on Capitol Hill.

[00:45:08] The things that I think should be no brainer votes

[00:45:15] for people who are Republican, it isn't.

[00:45:20] They have a different definition

[00:45:21] or they're looking at a different calculus.

[00:45:23] That's correct and I think that's why we have a pillar,

[00:45:26] those four pillars, so that you can decide

[00:45:29] and think about the other votes that you must make

[00:45:32] and we don't get involved in some issues

[00:45:35] so that we are not voting yes or no.

[00:45:37] It's like a neutral, you need to vote

[00:45:39] however you think you need to.

[00:45:42] Again, I wanna repeat that they are not telling me

[00:45:45] how to vote, I make that decision on my own.

[00:45:48] But you do need to understand the entirety

[00:45:53] of the four pillars and how we need to get back

[00:45:57] to the freedoms and liberties that we have so grown

[00:46:01] to cherish and now we have moved so far away

[00:46:05] from those freedoms and liberties

[00:46:06] and that is a concern that all of us

[00:46:09] as not only Georgians but across America

[00:46:13] that we should be concerned about our freedom

[00:46:16] and liberties being taken away.

[00:46:18] So if you were giving final advice

[00:46:22] to either legislators or to voters,

[00:46:25] what would be the final things you would say?

[00:46:28] Number one would be read the bill.

[00:46:30] Number two, give it serious consideration

[00:46:32] and put those four pillars in front of you

[00:46:36] so that we are not giving away all of the money

[00:46:40] that we bring in as new revenue.

[00:46:42] Make sure that you cautiously and carefully consider

[00:46:47] before voting and how it's going to affect

[00:46:51] other people in the community and in our state.

[00:46:55] I try to vote not so much on individual bills

[00:47:00] that will affect one or two people

[00:47:02] or maybe a dozen people but how it affects

[00:47:05] everybody across the state of Georgia.

[00:47:07] We are so used to voting for winners and losers,

[00:47:10] tax exemptions for certain companies

[00:47:12] but we don't give it to these other companies.

[00:47:15] Why is that?

[00:47:16] So if we're voting for something,

[00:47:18] everyone should see the same benefit.

[00:47:20] So I would suggest that you vote

[00:47:24] so I would suggest if you plan on voting,

[00:47:27] do all of those things first so that you understand

[00:47:30] that every vote and every bill that becomes a law

[00:47:34] takes someone's right away whether you agree with it or not.

[00:47:39] That is very good advice.

[00:47:41] Well Charlie Spurt, thank you so much

[00:47:43] for being with me today

[00:47:44] and for being such a strong conservative in Georgia.

[00:47:47] Thank you Jenny Baff.

[00:47:48] It was great to be part of this for sure

[00:47:50] and our relationship has grown exponentially

[00:47:53] through the years and always look forward

[00:47:55] to sitting down and chatting with you.

[00:47:57] The Jenny Baff Show is hosted by Jenny Baff Martin,

[00:48:01] produced by Kevin Mooneyham

[00:48:03] and directed by Luke Livingston.

[00:48:06] The Jenny Baff Show is a production

[00:48:08] of Tea Party Patriots Action.

[00:48:11] For more information visit teapartypatriots.org.

[00:48:17] If you liked this episode,

[00:48:18] let me know by hitting the light button

[00:48:20] or leaving a comment or a five-star review

[00:48:23] and if you wanna be the first to know

[00:48:25] every time we drop a new episode,

[00:48:27] be sure to subscribe and turn on notifications

[00:48:30] for whichever platform you're listening on.

[00:48:32] If you do these simple things,

[00:48:34] it will help the podcast grow

[00:48:35] and I'd really appreciate it.

[00:48:37] Thank you so much.

jenny beth martin,tea party patriots action,tea party patriots,state freedom caucus network,state freedom caucus,georgia,golden dome,house freedom caucus,republican,donald trump,overturned election,republican party,georgia state capitol,tea party,gop,election integrity,hfc,mallory staples,brian kemp,conservative,colton moore,charlice byrd,andy roth,